Cote Blog 5
Brian Cote
Professor Shirk
POLS 170
4 May 2022
Blog 5
Looking back at the previous blog posts written over the semester, the one that notably aged poorly was Blog 1. It was mentioned in Blog 1 that Ukrainian allies should take the approach of threatening economic instability through sanctions (consistent with the liberal ideology) as a way of deterring the Russian Federation from invading Ukrainian territories, as simply the threat of an imminent economic collapse would scare a nation out of a conflict. I believed that this route was so effective and desirable that it would likely prevent conflict and therefore ensure no shots were ever fired. This was written mere days before Russia sent troops into Ukraine, thus making my argument appear unreliable and too optimistic. While I still believe that the economic sanctions placed on the Russian economy are still draining supporter’s faith in the Russian war effort, I admit I did not consider that Russia could still have its war while dealing with the economic sanctions in other faucets. Russia has threatened to cut off various NATO countries from its exports of natural gas causing a surge of panic from those who indirectly support Ukraine’s war effort; a move I was unaware was going to cause such chaos. Now the United States is being looked at to alleviate this potential natural gas shortage and has been pressured by their allies to fix the problems caused by supporting Ukraine in its war. Given these new facts, I believe that the liberal approach of economic threats of sanctions as a way of ensuring peace has been utterly ineffective in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. My previous blog praised this method of action because I believed it would help the most people, however currently there is a full scale war raging and consumers all across the world are being hurt, which is especially unfair to the socioeconomically poor in Europe because soon gas prices will be exponentially higher meaning people will not be able to afford to heat their homes or light their stoves. Thus, the war turns global and hurts everyone as a result, not even taking into account the massive losses of life on either side of the conflict itself. It would be in everyone's interests to minimize the negative effects of war, however with the longer the Russian-Ukrainian conflict drags on, it seems more and more people across the world are being negatively affected.
https://www.bbc.com/news/58888451
I agree that this war is a sad situation that is negatively affecting everyone around the world. I am not sure how long the war will last but hopefully countries can come up with an effective solution to stop Russia because as you mentioned the sanctions haven't really helped.
ReplyDeleteI find this blog post very interesting with how you brought up the sanctions-paradox. Personally, I believe that calling sanctions on Russia did not benefit the way that is was supposed to and deter them from starting a war. It's unfortunate with how many people are being affected and all of those who will suffer from this. I do believe that maybe if sanctions were not placed on Russia as early as they were, there could have been a slight difference with how everything is be handled right now.
ReplyDelete